Go Bottom2210 w 49 quot FEL 54 quot MMM R4
 | mykeln
Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 7 Northern Virginia 
|
2004-09-14 96462
Hi,
Looking to purchase a 2210 and got the following quote:
2210 w/ R4 tires, front case weights, weighted rear tires.
$9700.
FEL 210 w/ 49" bucket, level indicator, ballast, hood guard
$2100
54" MMM
$1200.
54" Front Blade w/Quick Hitch and Angling
$1000.
prices include setup, dlvery
Total less tax: $14000.
Any comments? Should I negotiate up to the 53" bucket?
Thanks for any and all help.
Reply to |
Quote Reply |
Add Photo2210 w 49 quot FEL 54 quot MMM R4
 | JDFANATIC
Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 119 Southington, CT
 Pics
|
2004-09-16 96624
mykeln,
I can't comment about your exact package, but I paid: $9227 for the tractor, $1556 for the 62" MMM (WHICH I WOULD HIGHLY RECOMMEND DUE TO THE OVERLAP), an $2163 for the FEl w/53" bucket, rear ballast, and leveling indicator (all of which I would recommend). I also purchased the front hitch with PTo for my snowblower, but those $ won't help you any.
The 2210 is an awesome package for a "gentleman" farmer. Please don't aske me to explain that last comment. ....
Reply to |
Quote Reply |
Add Photo2210 w 49 quot FEL 54 quot MMM R4
 | bigpete
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 117 Delaware
Pics
|
2004-09-17 96730
Hi, mykeln. When I had my 2210, I thought the 49" bucket was the right choice. It covered my wheel stance width. I did quite a bit of digging and moving rock, so it was the right size, The advantages of the 53" are the ability to work closer to building and objects plus, of course, increased volume in the bucket. Recommended if you are going to move lots of lighter materials or soil. I agree 100% on the recommendation to get the larger deck unles it won't fit between something on your property. The ability to trim closer to trees, fences etc., make the extra $ worth it. Not to mention the faster cut of larger areas. Pete ....
Reply to |
Quote Reply |
Add Photo
Go Top
Share This